Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Baz's avatar

Great interview there and super engaging.

If we agree that our consciousness emerged through natural selection then if AI achieves consciousness could that not be considered as Richard argues a feature of an extended phenotype?

Here’s ChatGTP’s answer to the same question:

Yes, under a generous and philosophically expansive reading of Dawkins’ extended phenotype, a conscious AI created by humans could arguably be considered part of that extended phenotype — particularly as an expression of our cognitive design capacities evolved through natural selection. But this interpretation would push the boundaries of the original biological concept into a more speculative and philosophical realm.

I hope this doesn’t sound too cynical but money then must also be considered an extended phenotype as it seems to be a contributing factor in the AI arms race.

Expand full comment
Mark Slight's avatar

Dennett already answered this question: "they are not conscious in any interesting way". But I'll check out the video!

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts