Fascinating show. It’s wonderful to see science being championed given that we now seem to be mired in a kind of new Dark Age. Modern beliefs such as the overvaluing of “lived experience” and other privileging of subjectivity e.g. if someone is offended, that is positive proof that the other party IS offensive, no need for a presumption of innocence etc., and insane ideas such as the notion that wanting to be a woman and saying you are one magically starts a process of transubstantiation whereby a man can become a woman.
How did we get here? The rot started to set in with Foucault. And the modern Left has been only to happy to embrace pure nonsense.
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
Actually I wasn’t talking about the creationists, at least not the Christian type. I’m talking about the modern day creationists who believe the world can be changed through social engineering, the enforcement of politically correct language, the policing of blasphemous speech (think hate speech laws) and the Woke allies and zealots (doctors, therapists, teachers and politicians) who believe in male to female transubstantiation. I’m pointing out that even though this is an old show, we haven’t made progress in terms of respect for science, and nowadays the modern left is only too happy to embrace anti-scientific ideas. Back then it was the right that rejected science. And they still do in many ways but the left is outstripping them in adherence to (new) crazy beliefs and is enforcing these beliefs on those of us who don’t share them.
Deciphering a lot of this cult-like nomenclature is a tedious waste of time for most people and its use obscures the truth about what communism really is and where it actually came from. But that is exactly its purpose . . .
“Woke,” “wokeism,” “wokeness,” etc., are nomenclatures used to obscure and occlude the truth about the Jews and the Frankfurt School.
That’s not what I mean by social engineering. I’m talking about things like separating kids into race-based “affinity groups” at school so they develop a sense of themselves as “racialised beings”, and indoctrinating kids in gender ideology, critical race theory and queer theory at school.
I personally feel that mutilating and sterilising kids in their thousands on the basis of a completely insane belief is important. More and more kids are identifying into these bizarre gender identities. It’s a medical scandal of epic proportions.
Also important is the demolition of women’s sex-based rights and of centuries-old safeguarding measures to protect women and children from predatory men.
Not to mention the extremely corrosive effect on our society and on democracy of governments and institutions simply denying reality and coercing people to pay lip service to ridiculous beliefs.
Climate change isn’t the only thing worth worrying about.
The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds.
As a general rule, the science community as a whole is usually not capable of a "scientific way of thinking". To me, that phrase would mean something like "the application of reason to the advancement of human welfare".
The science community is clinging blindly to an outdated, simplistic and increasingly dangerous 19th century style "more is better" relationship with knowledge. This relationship was entirely rational in the long era of knowledge scarcity. The science community seems incapable of grasping that we no longer live in the old knowledge scarcity era, but in a radically different new era characterized by knowledge exploding in every direction at an ever accelerating rate. We are failing to adapt to a changing environment, and I'm sure Dr. Dawkins could tell us how that usually works out.
The "more is better" relationship with knowledge that lies at the heart of the scientific enterprise and the modern world is built upon a typically unexamined faith based assumption that human beings can successfully manage whatever powers that may emerge from scientific discovery.
That assumption was true IN THE PAST when the powers being discovered were relatively modest, and not capable of bringing down the system as a whole. That past era ended on August 6, 1945 at 8:15am over Hiroshima Japan. Instead of learning from that event, the science community is leading us ever faster in to ever deeper waters.
Nuclear weapons - no idea how to make them safe
Genetic engineering - no idea how to make it safe
Artificial intelligence - no idea how to make it safe
And the 21st century is still young, and more such vast powers which we also won't know how to make safe are surely coming. As the number and scale of such vast powers continues to grow, the room for error is being steadily erased, and the odds are increasingly against us. This is where the science community is leading us, not to utopia, but disaster.
Unless we are to assume that human beings are gods, a theory Dr. Dawkins is unlikely to endorse, there is some limit to humanity's ability to safely manage vast powers. Whatever that limit is, we are racing towards it an an ever accelerating pace. And due to the vast scale of the powers being uncovered by the science community, when we reach that limit of human ability the modern world we inhabit may be over too quickly for us to respond.
If this sounds like wild alarmist speculation, please keep in mind that we currently have thousands of massive hair trigger hydrogen bombs aimed at our heads, and they are patiently waiting in their silos for that one bad day which can bring everything we care about to a quick end. It can all be over in a hour. And we know that. But choose to ignore threat. And that is an act of insanity which is perhaps the best argument for slowing down the development of more vast powers.
I don't doubt that Dr. Dawkins is sincere in his beliefs. But like most of the scientific community, he is not really a person of reason, but an ideologist, and he has those two things confused. Today's science community is clinging to a "more is better" relationship with knowledge ideology in much the same blind faith manner that religious authority in previous centuries clung to the divinity of Jesus ideology.
What we should be learning is how to take control of the knowledge explosion. And that's the one thing the science community is not interested in learning.
Dr. Dawkins would likely counsel us to challenge any cultural authority which is not firmly grounded in reason. On this we agree. And so that's what I'm attempting to do here.
Le judéo-messianisme répand parmi nous son message empoisonné depuis près de deux mille ans. Les universalismes démocratique et communiste sont plus récents, mais ils n’ont fait que renforcer le vieux récit juif. Ce sont les mêmes idéaux.
Les idéaux transnationaux, transraciaux, transsexuels, transculturels que ces idéologies nous prêchent (au-delà des peuples, des races, des cultures) et qui sont le subsistance quotidienne de nos écoles, dans nos médias, dans notre culture populaire, à nos universités, et sur nos rues, ont fini par réduire notre identité biosymbolique et notre fierté ethnique à leur expression minimale.
Les banquiers juifs ont inondé l’Europe de musulmans et l’Amérique de déchets du tiers-monde . . . L'exil comme punition pour ceux qui prêchent la sédition devrait être rétabli dans le cadre juridique de l'Occident . . . Le judaïsme, le christianisme, et l’islam sont des cultes de mort originaires du Moyen-Orient et totalement étrangers à l’Europe et à ses peuples.
On se demande parfois pourquoi la gauche européenne s’entend si bien avec les musulmans. Pourquoi un mouvement souvent ouvertement antireligieux prend-il le parti d’une religiosité farouche qui semble s’opposer à presque tout ce que la gauche a toujours prétendu défendre ? Une partie de l’explication réside dans le fait que l’Islam et le marxisme ont une racine idéologique commune : le judaïsme.
Don Rumsfeld avait raison lorsqu’il disait : «L’Europe s’est décalé sur son axe», c’est le mauvais côté qui a gagné la Seconde Guerre mondiale, et cela devient chaque jour plus clair . . . Qu’a fait l’OTAN pour défendre l’Europe? Absolument rien . . . Mes ennemis ne sont pas à Moscou, à Damas, à Téhéran, à Riyad ou dans quelque croque-mitaine teutonique éthéré, mes ennemis sont à Washington, Bruxelles et Tel Aviv . . .
“I know that there are some Jews in the English colonies. These Marranos go wherever there is money to be made... But whether these circumcised who sell old clothes claim that they are of the tribe of Naphtali or Issachar is not of the slightest importance. They are, simply, the biggest scoundrels who have ever dirtied the face of the earth.” — François-Marie Voltaire
With respect to "fine tuning", when debating creationists, why is it difficult to argue that a species, who developed their number system around the fact that they have 10 fingers, has found many fundemental constants to be "irrational".
Pardonne mon français . . . Je suis obligé d'écrire dans plusieurs langues parce que : 1. La plupart des gens aux États-Unis ont subi un lavage de cerveau leur faisant croire que les Juifs sont leur salut ; et 2., leur anglais est de la merde et ils ne peuvent pas rester silencieux assez longtemps pour entendre ou voir ce qui se passe évidemment autour d'eux . . . Le judéo-messianisme répand parmi nous son message empoisonné depuis près de deux mille ans. Les universalismes démocratique et communiste sont plus récents, mais ils n’ont fait que renforcer le vieux récit juif. Ce sont les mêmes idéaux.
Les idéaux transnationaux, transraciaux, transsexuels, transculturels que ces idéologies nous prêchent (au-delà des peuples, des races, des cultures) et qui sont le subsistance quotidienne de nos écoles, dans nos médias, dans notre culture populaire, à nos universités, et sur nos rues, ont fini par réduire notre identité biosymbolique et notre fierté ethnique à leur expression minimale.
Les banquiers juifs ont inondé l’Europe de musulmans et l’Amérique de déchets du tiers-monde . . . L'exil comme punition pour ceux qui prêchent la sédition devrait être rétabli dans le cadre juridique de l'Occident . . . Le judaïsme, le christianisme, et l’islam sont des cultes de mort originaires du Moyen-Orient et totalement étrangers à l’Europe et à ses peuples.
On se demande parfois pourquoi la gauche européenne s’entend si bien avec les musulmans. Pourquoi un mouvement souvent ouvertement antireligieux prend-il le parti d’une religiosité farouche qui semble s’opposer à presque tout ce que la gauche a toujours prétendu défendre ? Une partie de l’explication réside dans le fait que l’Islam et le marxisme ont une racine idéologique commune : le judaïsme.
Don Rumsfeld avait raison lorsqu’il disait : «L’Europe s’est décalé sur son axe», c’est le mauvais côté qui a gagné la Seconde Guerre mondiale, et cela devient chaque jour plus clair . . . Qu’a fait l’OTAN pour défendre l’Europe? Absolument rien . . . Mes ennemis ne sont pas à Moscou, à Damas, à Téhéran, à Riyad ou dans quelque croque-mitaine teutonique éthéré, mes ennemis sont à Washington, Bruxelles et Tel Aviv . . .
“Je sais qu'il y a des juifs dans les colonies anglaises. Ces marranes vont partout où il y a de l'argent à gagner... Mais que ces circoncis qui vendent de vieux vêtements prétendent être de la tribu de Nephtali ou d'Issacar n'a pas la moindre importance. Ce sont, tout simplement, les plus grands scélérats qui aient jamais sali la face de la terre.” — François-Marie Voltaire
Jewish messianism has been spreading its poisonous message among us for nearly two thousand years. Democratic and communist universalisms are more recent, but they have only come to reinforce the old Jewish narrative. These are the same ideals
Jewish messianism has been spreading its poisonous message among us for nearly two thousand years. Democratic and communist universalisms are more recent, but they have only come to reinforce the old Jewish narrative. These are the same ideals
Jewish messianism has been spreading its poisonous message among us for nearly two thousand years. Democratic and communist universalisms are more recent, but they have only come to reinforce the old Jewish narrative. These are the same ideals
. . . The transnational, transracial, transcultural ideals that these ideologies preach to us (beyond peoples, races, cultures) and are the daily sustenance of our schools, in our media, in our pop-culture, at our universities, and on our streets, have reduced our biosymbolic identity and ethnic pride to their minimal expression.
No country is running its own race in this invasion because it's all a political agenda run by the United Nations and pushed by the Jews and their puppets (politicians). Most people simply don't want to know or understand that this is a political agenda. However, some manage to understand that politicians are deliberately working to import Muslims and replace the people, but that's about it, they're like a computer that can't go on because the program doesn't allow it.
“Oh how fond they are of the book of Esther, which is so beautifully attuned to their bloodthirsty, vengeful, murderous yearning and hope.” — Martin Luther
Fascinating show. It’s wonderful to see science being championed given that we now seem to be mired in a kind of new Dark Age. Modern beliefs such as the overvaluing of “lived experience” and other privileging of subjectivity e.g. if someone is offended, that is positive proof that the other party IS offensive, no need for a presumption of innocence etc., and insane ideas such as the notion that wanting to be a woman and saying you are one magically starts a process of transubstantiation whereby a man can become a woman.
How did we get here? The rot started to set in with Foucault. And the modern Left has been only to happy to embrace pure nonsense.
Evolution is heterosexual.
That’s true. Facts are very unpopular now.
NATO = NORTH ATLANTIC TRANSGENDER ORGANIZATION
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution
Actually I wasn’t talking about the creationists, at least not the Christian type. I’m talking about the modern day creationists who believe the world can be changed through social engineering, the enforcement of politically correct language, the policing of blasphemous speech (think hate speech laws) and the Woke allies and zealots (doctors, therapists, teachers and politicians) who believe in male to female transubstantiation. I’m pointing out that even though this is an old show, we haven’t made progress in terms of respect for science, and nowadays the modern left is only too happy to embrace anti-scientific ideas. Back then it was the right that rejected science. And they still do in many ways but the left is outstripping them in adherence to (new) crazy beliefs and is enforcing these beliefs on those of us who don’t share them.
Deciphering a lot of this cult-like nomenclature is a tedious waste of time for most people and its use obscures the truth about what communism really is and where it actually came from. But that is exactly its purpose . . .
“Woke,” “wokeism,” “wokeness,” etc., are nomenclatures used to obscure and occlude the truth about the Jews and the Frankfurt School.
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/how-the-grift-right-gimps-for-the
That’s not what I mean by social engineering. I’m talking about things like separating kids into race-based “affinity groups” at school so they develop a sense of themselves as “racialised beings”, and indoctrinating kids in gender ideology, critical race theory and queer theory at school.
I personally feel that mutilating and sterilising kids in their thousands on the basis of a completely insane belief is important. More and more kids are identifying into these bizarre gender identities. It’s a medical scandal of epic proportions.
Also important is the demolition of women’s sex-based rights and of centuries-old safeguarding measures to protect women and children from predatory men.
Not to mention the extremely corrosive effect on our society and on democracy of governments and institutions simply denying reality and coercing people to pay lip service to ridiculous beliefs.
Climate change isn’t the only thing worth worrying about.
The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds.
https://nordicresistancemovement.org/what-is-cultural-marxism/
As a general rule, the science community as a whole is usually not capable of a "scientific way of thinking". To me, that phrase would mean something like "the application of reason to the advancement of human welfare".
The science community is clinging blindly to an outdated, simplistic and increasingly dangerous 19th century style "more is better" relationship with knowledge. This relationship was entirely rational in the long era of knowledge scarcity. The science community seems incapable of grasping that we no longer live in the old knowledge scarcity era, but in a radically different new era characterized by knowledge exploding in every direction at an ever accelerating rate. We are failing to adapt to a changing environment, and I'm sure Dr. Dawkins could tell us how that usually works out.
The "more is better" relationship with knowledge that lies at the heart of the scientific enterprise and the modern world is built upon a typically unexamined faith based assumption that human beings can successfully manage whatever powers that may emerge from scientific discovery.
That assumption was true IN THE PAST when the powers being discovered were relatively modest, and not capable of bringing down the system as a whole. That past era ended on August 6, 1945 at 8:15am over Hiroshima Japan. Instead of learning from that event, the science community is leading us ever faster in to ever deeper waters.
Nuclear weapons - no idea how to make them safe
Genetic engineering - no idea how to make it safe
Artificial intelligence - no idea how to make it safe
And the 21st century is still young, and more such vast powers which we also won't know how to make safe are surely coming. As the number and scale of such vast powers continues to grow, the room for error is being steadily erased, and the odds are increasingly against us. This is where the science community is leading us, not to utopia, but disaster.
Unless we are to assume that human beings are gods, a theory Dr. Dawkins is unlikely to endorse, there is some limit to humanity's ability to safely manage vast powers. Whatever that limit is, we are racing towards it an an ever accelerating pace. And due to the vast scale of the powers being uncovered by the science community, when we reach that limit of human ability the modern world we inhabit may be over too quickly for us to respond.
If this sounds like wild alarmist speculation, please keep in mind that we currently have thousands of massive hair trigger hydrogen bombs aimed at our heads, and they are patiently waiting in their silos for that one bad day which can bring everything we care about to a quick end. It can all be over in a hour. And we know that. But choose to ignore threat. And that is an act of insanity which is perhaps the best argument for slowing down the development of more vast powers.
I don't doubt that Dr. Dawkins is sincere in his beliefs. But like most of the scientific community, he is not really a person of reason, but an ideologist, and he has those two things confused. Today's science community is clinging to a "more is better" relationship with knowledge ideology in much the same blind faith manner that religious authority in previous centuries clung to the divinity of Jesus ideology.
What we should be learning is how to take control of the knowledge explosion. And that's the one thing the science community is not interested in learning.
Dr. Dawkins would likely counsel us to challenge any cultural authority which is not firmly grounded in reason. On this we agree. And so that's what I'm attempting to do here.
Le judéo-messianisme répand parmi nous son message empoisonné depuis près de deux mille ans. Les universalismes démocratique et communiste sont plus récents, mais ils n’ont fait que renforcer le vieux récit juif. Ce sont les mêmes idéaux.
Les idéaux transnationaux, transraciaux, transsexuels, transculturels que ces idéologies nous prêchent (au-delà des peuples, des races, des cultures) et qui sont le subsistance quotidienne de nos écoles, dans nos médias, dans notre culture populaire, à nos universités, et sur nos rues, ont fini par réduire notre identité biosymbolique et notre fierté ethnique à leur expression minimale.
Les banquiers juifs ont inondé l’Europe de musulmans et l’Amérique de déchets du tiers-monde . . . L'exil comme punition pour ceux qui prêchent la sédition devrait être rétabli dans le cadre juridique de l'Occident . . . Le judaïsme, le christianisme, et l’islam sont des cultes de mort originaires du Moyen-Orient et totalement étrangers à l’Europe et à ses peuples.
On se demande parfois pourquoi la gauche européenne s’entend si bien avec les musulmans. Pourquoi un mouvement souvent ouvertement antireligieux prend-il le parti d’une religiosité farouche qui semble s’opposer à presque tout ce que la gauche a toujours prétendu défendre ? Une partie de l’explication réside dans le fait que l’Islam et le marxisme ont une racine idéologique commune : le judaïsme.
Don Rumsfeld avait raison lorsqu’il disait : «L’Europe s’est décalé sur son axe», c’est le mauvais côté qui a gagné la Seconde Guerre mondiale, et cela devient chaque jour plus clair . . . Qu’a fait l’OTAN pour défendre l’Europe? Absolument rien . . . Mes ennemis ne sont pas à Moscou, à Damas, à Téhéran, à Riyad ou dans quelque croque-mitaine teutonique éthéré, mes ennemis sont à Washington, Bruxelles et Tel Aviv . . .
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/pardonne-mon-francais-va-te-faire
The simplicity in the talk to the children is helpful for recent generations who have been indoctrinated with religious dogma.
“I know that there are some Jews in the English colonies. These Marranos go wherever there is money to be made... But whether these circumcised who sell old clothes claim that they are of the tribe of Naphtali or Issachar is not of the slightest importance. They are, simply, the biggest scoundrels who have ever dirtied the face of the earth.” — François-Marie Voltaire
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/pardonne-mon-francais-va-te-faire
With respect to "fine tuning", when debating creationists, why is it difficult to argue that a species, who developed their number system around the fact that they have 10 fingers, has found many fundemental constants to be "irrational".
Pardonne mon français . . . Je suis obligé d'écrire dans plusieurs langues parce que : 1. La plupart des gens aux États-Unis ont subi un lavage de cerveau leur faisant croire que les Juifs sont leur salut ; et 2., leur anglais est de la merde et ils ne peuvent pas rester silencieux assez longtemps pour entendre ou voir ce qui se passe évidemment autour d'eux . . . Le judéo-messianisme répand parmi nous son message empoisonné depuis près de deux mille ans. Les universalismes démocratique et communiste sont plus récents, mais ils n’ont fait que renforcer le vieux récit juif. Ce sont les mêmes idéaux.
Les idéaux transnationaux, transraciaux, transsexuels, transculturels que ces idéologies nous prêchent (au-delà des peuples, des races, des cultures) et qui sont le subsistance quotidienne de nos écoles, dans nos médias, dans notre culture populaire, à nos universités, et sur nos rues, ont fini par réduire notre identité biosymbolique et notre fierté ethnique à leur expression minimale.
Les banquiers juifs ont inondé l’Europe de musulmans et l’Amérique de déchets du tiers-monde . . . L'exil comme punition pour ceux qui prêchent la sédition devrait être rétabli dans le cadre juridique de l'Occident . . . Le judaïsme, le christianisme, et l’islam sont des cultes de mort originaires du Moyen-Orient et totalement étrangers à l’Europe et à ses peuples.
On se demande parfois pourquoi la gauche européenne s’entend si bien avec les musulmans. Pourquoi un mouvement souvent ouvertement antireligieux prend-il le parti d’une religiosité farouche qui semble s’opposer à presque tout ce que la gauche a toujours prétendu défendre ? Une partie de l’explication réside dans le fait que l’Islam et le marxisme ont une racine idéologique commune : le judaïsme.
Don Rumsfeld avait raison lorsqu’il disait : «L’Europe s’est décalé sur son axe», c’est le mauvais côté qui a gagné la Seconde Guerre mondiale, et cela devient chaque jour plus clair . . . Qu’a fait l’OTAN pour défendre l’Europe? Absolument rien . . . Mes ennemis ne sont pas à Moscou, à Damas, à Téhéran, à Riyad ou dans quelque croque-mitaine teutonique éthéré, mes ennemis sont à Washington, Bruxelles et Tel Aviv . . .
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/pardonne-mon-francais-va-te-faire
That’s actually my point.
“Je sais qu'il y a des juifs dans les colonies anglaises. Ces marranes vont partout où il y a de l'argent à gagner... Mais que ces circoncis qui vendent de vieux vêtements prétendent être de la tribu de Nephtali ou d'Issacar n'a pas la moindre importance. Ce sont, tout simplement, les plus grands scélérats qui aient jamais sali la face de la terre.” — François-Marie Voltaire
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/pardonne-mon-francais-va-te-faire
wtf are you even talking about
Jewish messianism has been spreading its poisonous message among us for nearly two thousand years. Democratic and communist universalisms are more recent, but they have only come to reinforce the old Jewish narrative. These are the same ideals
Jewish messianism has been spreading its poisonous message among us for nearly two thousand years. Democratic and communist universalisms are more recent, but they have only come to reinforce the old Jewish narrative. These are the same ideals
Jewish messianism has been spreading its poisonous message among us for nearly two thousand years. Democratic and communist universalisms are more recent, but they have only come to reinforce the old Jewish narrative. These are the same ideals
. . . The transnational, transracial, transcultural ideals that these ideologies preach to us (beyond peoples, races, cultures) and are the daily sustenance of our schools, in our media, in our pop-culture, at our universities, and on our streets, have reduced our biosymbolic identity and ethnic pride to their minimal expression.
No country is running its own race in this invasion because it's all a political agenda run by the United Nations and pushed by the Jews and their puppets (politicians). Most people simply don't want to know or understand that this is a political agenda. However, some manage to understand that politicians are deliberately working to import Muslims and replace the people, but that's about it, they're like a computer that can't go on because the program doesn't allow it.
.
'Holocaust Education': An Excuse to Bludgeon Everyone Into Accepting Jewish Moral Supremacy . . . https://russia-insider.com/en/society/holocaust-education-excuse-bludgeon-everyone-accepting-jewish-moral-supremacy/ri27460
“Oh how fond they are of the book of Esther, which is so beautifully attuned to their bloodthirsty, vengeful, murderous yearning and hope.” — Martin Luther
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/zelensky-biden-satanism-war-greed